The skinny: accounting rules required
"mark-to-market" pricing of securities. This means the bank has to
adjust the value of securities it holds as assets continuously as the price of
such securities changes. This is a legal issue so I will quote:
"The allegations date back before the
2008 financial crisis erupted. Plaintiffs allege that Citi, the nation’s third
largest bank behind JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, lied to its own
shareholders regarding tens of billions
of dollars in toxic mortgage-backed securities on its books. The bank did not
writedown the positions down even though executives there knew the assets were
worth less than what the books reflected, shareholders claim." (the quote is from Forbes)
Another quote from the same article in
Forbes: "The settlement of $590 million, which has yet to be approved by a
New York judge, is a hefty sum for Citi but it helps clear some of its ongoing
litigation related to the financial crisis. The bank, which denied wrongdoing,
saw shares pop up almost 2% and led financial stocks today."
This means that:
- nobody is guilty, as long as they can pay the fine;
- according to markets, the fine was not
too high (in fairness, the increase in the price of the stock could reflect the
elimination of uncertainty".
No comments:
Post a Comment